01 April 2012

Comments for second half of March, 2012

Drugmonkey looks at the chase for perfection in a scientific career.

Matt Shipman weighs in on the question of whether a science journalist should be able to read and understand a scientific paper.

How long does it take you to write a scientific paper? Code for Life investigates.

Does the Deep Sea Challenge mean science is a rich man’s game?

Scicurious hates networking. The comment thread is pretty darn helpful, too. Some threads were picked up in Dr. Becca’s blog looking at conference size.

Where’s the science love, Twitter? Chris Dieni feels unloved and unanswered by the Twitterverse.

Dr. Doyenne looks at the good science on YouTube.

No comments: